Search

Thursday, 21 July 2011

iTunes music store and iPod's days numbered

Remember that quaint age when people actually bought their music - way back before everyone started stealing the stuff online? Now it's beginning to look like the idea of collecting music, legally or illegally, is about to become equally outdated. We suspect that the days of the iTunes music store and the iPod (although possibly not the iPhone and Touch versions) are also numbered.
A few separate events over the past couple of weeks have got us thinking about the new world of music. Firstly, this week the Spotify music streaming service finally cracked the US market, apparently after capping free listening to 10 hours a month.
Spotify has been a great success in the UK and northern Europe, signing up more than 10 million users to stream whatever they want from a library of more than 15 million tracks. The streaming quality is absurdly good, so good that 1.6 million of its users have actually agreed to - gasp! - pay a subscription for additional features such as having the service available on their mobile phones.
We are prepared to bet that the round of negotiations between Spotify and the US record labels would also have included access to the Australian market. We'd be very surprised indeed if Spotify didn't turn up here within the next 12 months, just as the local iTunes Store followed the opening of its US parent.
Last month, the Anubis.fm subscription service which is available in Australia, announced that it was doubling its library to 4 million tracks. That will shortly rise to 6.5 million tracks, when Anubis adds the Australian music charts back to the 1950s.
You can play that music via a PC, but it becomes much more accessible, and in our view becomes the future default for music lovers, when you link it with a multi-room music streaming system.
That's the other significant development of the week: the release by the Rolls Royce of that category - Sonos - of a new, cheaper speaker called the Play:3. It looks like a typical desktop package, but the heft of it tells you there's more inside: three Class-D digital amplifiers and three drivers - one tweeter and two 3-inch mid-range, with a passive, rear-firing bass and self-sensing adjustment that shifts the sound field depending on whether it's positioned vertically or horizontally. Put two of them in one room, and you can set them up as left and right channels of a true stereo system.
At $419, the Play:3 brings the attractions that have lured more moneyed audiophiles to its big brother, the S5 (now called the Play:5) to a much wider audience.
Even without a subscription service, the way the Sonos links to a music library on your PC or Mac or Networked Attached Storage, is compelling. It gives you easy access to internet radio, streaming different programs to different rooms or the entire house. With a subscription service, it's completely addictive. Party playlists become almost infinitely deep. Someone wants to hear another track? No problem, just plug it in.
It's a combination that's highly likely to have you experience once more that forgotten feeling of pulling out your wallet to feed your taste for music.


Read more: http://www.theage.com.au/digital-life/computers/blogs/bleeding-edge/itunes-music-store-and-ipods-days-numbered-20110721-1hqfb.html#ixzz1So5qpunI

Don't waste your time at the gym

The basics of exercise are good form, good breathing, good tempo, and good intensity. The basics of exercise are good form, good breathing, good tempo, and good intensity. Photo: Robert Pearce
I love watching those people at the gym who move with fluidity, intensity, and a sense of purpose.  These types of people, big or small, get results and reach their goals.
Unfortunately, many of the other workouts I witness resemble train wrecks. I know - it’s your body, your health and your future wellbeing - but some of you seem to be making some pretty big mistakes.
To help those people get back on track with their fitness I have compiled a list of the top 8 things you should really try to avoid doing at the gym.
Training with zero intensity
Stop with the 30 minute cross trainer sessions while getting in some talk-show giggles and watching Bieber videos - you could burn more calories walking around Luna Park. Man-up and train with some intensity. Get some knowledge around circuit training, strength/hypertrophy training, CrossFit or High Intensity Interval Training (HIIT).
Creating an imbalanced body
You want a big chest, so all you do is chest, chest, chest work. Bad idea. Why? Because in doing so much chest work, as you strengthen, you tighten and turn into a hunched over kyphotic mess. You must balance your body with an equal ratio of back exercises to ensure balance and decent alignment.  Good posture means a good body. Hunched over posture means you look like the antagonist in a Marvel Comics movie.
And if you build your upper body, don’t forget about building the legs, eh? Squats/deadlifts.  Triceps/biceps. Hypertrophy/cardio. Yin/Yang. Church/Pub. Balance your body, and balance your life.

Poor planning
If you attack the array of fitness machines like a Sizzler buffet, you’re going at it all wrong.  First, think about your goal. We all have fitness goals, but if you have no plan on how to get there, you won’t get there. So what’s your plan for your body at the gym? Think. Research. Learn. Make a plan.
Enjoying the easy-peasy
I once trained a lovely guy who was new to the country, and after five sit ups, he exclaimed ‘‘Michael, this hurts. I think I twisted my organs’’.
It’s easy to lay on the couch. It’s easy to shift your body weight back and forth for 30 minutes on the stair machine. You do what’s easy with the mindframe of ‘at least I’m doing something’.
It’s hard to run real stairs, and it’s hard to make a lifestyle change. Training should hurt a little bit.  Good, healthy pain with some sweating and swearing is good progress, and you won’t even twist your organs.
Understanding good v bad cardio
Do you enjoy walking on the treadmill? The belt is doing the moving for you. Skip it.
In fact, get skipping – rope. Jump roping is one of the biggest calorie burning exercises you can choose.  Try 100. Try 200. Try doing some double unders. Your heart rate will go through the roof. In fact, according to a study on The Mayo Clinic’s website, skipping rope burns 50 per cent more calories than swimming laps. Rowing is serious cardio work; so is sprinting and hill running.
Style stinks
Your deadlift with a rounded back will cause you so much pain tomorrow. Your lack of breathing might cause even more damage. You run like you’re missing a quad. Likewise your bicep curls with that cheating back thrust, and your Zumba moves wouldn’t even cut it in a bar on Friday at midnight.
The basics are tough to learn, but they are: good form, good breathing, good tempo, and good intensity.
Negating your workout
Outside the gym, do you smoke? Do you hit beer o’clock 3 days a week with a slab of cold gold, movies, and frozen pizza? Do you sleep four hours a night?
Good nutrition, hydration, and rest matters. It’s not completely what you do in the gym; all the naughty bits outside count too.
Doing the same ole cardio
Only a caged guinea pig runs in the same wheel every day, doing the same ole thing. Hit the weights.  Build some strength, and you’ll build lean muscles and burn more fat. Change up your cardio work, and change up your weight bearing sessions because the body doesn’t like change. So, it will adapt to a new stimulus, and change for the good and help you reach goals.
Not doing a Thing
I could write volumes about form, intensity, tempo, and breathing, and the number of sets and reps required for strength, hypertrophy, and toning exercises, but in reality the worst thing you can do is not doing a thing. And the cost argument doesn’t cut it because the truth is if you want to get fit, you don’t even have to join a gym.
We live in one of the most beautiful countries in the world. The running trails, the ocean, the parks, the hikes … it’s endless and so damn simple. So get outside. Get moving. Just do something that combines fun and intensity and watch what you put into your body.
What sort of gym mistakes most annoy you?


Read more: http://www.theage.com.au/executive-style/fitness/blogs/boot-camp/dont-waste-your-time-at-the-gym-20110708-1h6co.html#ixzz1So5amhW4

Facebook could become adults only in Australia

Facebook Facebook could become an adults-only forum to protect against online predators. Photo: AP
Ways to force Facebook to give parents access to their kids' profiles will be discussed today by state and federal attorneys-general in a meeting that will also examine an 18+ Facebook age limit.
The idea was first proposed by a South Australian Family First MP, Dennis Hood, and is being championed by South Australian Attorney-General John Rau. Rau argued that giving parents assistance to supervise their children on Facebook would help protect against online predators and limit access to unsuitable material.
But Susan McLean, who was Victoria Police's first cyber safety officer and is now an online safety consultant, said the proposal was “ill informed and it shows a total lack of understanding of what the internet is”.
“It's not Facebook's fault that there are problems on Facebook. You can't legislate against stupidity or poor parenting or anything like that,” said McLean.
“It would be nice but it can't be done and it breaks down any level of trust that you should be trying to develop with your kids.”
Facebook's terms of use currently requires users to be aged at least 13 but there is no proof of age requirement and kids regularly lie to gain access.
At their meeting today, the country's top lawmakers will consider requiring proof of age checks and even raising the age limit to 18, federal Attorney-General Robert McClelland confirmed.
This would be at stark odds with recent comments from Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg, who floated the idea of removing the 13 minimum sign-up age policy.
“Age verification is something that various platforms deal with and I can't see why it should be beyond the wit of Facebook to do the same thing, if that was the solution people wanted,” said Rau.
“I think people need to understand that just because they are operating in the virtual world, that is on the internet, it does not mean that there should not be boundaries or rules or standards of behaviour.
“Exactly how these boundaries and rules should be applied and enforced is a matter that we need to discuss.”
It is unclear how the attorneys-general could apply such regulations to Facebook given it is a US-based company. Rau said changing the rules on access to Facebook would require cooperation from operators and the federal government would need to use its communications powers.
McClelland said yesterday it would be Rau's task to come up with methods of implementing the restrictions.
He said Rau made a fair point as “there has been concern expressed by some parents that the images being put up by their own children are prejudicial to their future career prospects”.
“I think that all Attorneys recognise it as a legitimate issue to raise and … John having raised it, will be tasked … to come back with a few suggested solutions,” said McClelland.
“Having Australian jurisdiction extend off shore is the challenge. That's not to say a bit of discussion can't get some goodwill. Hopefully we will be able to look at a few options.”
Asked whether the issue could be solved simply by parents sitting down with their children, rather than with new regulations, McClelland agreed that this would be a preferable approach.
“Having said that, I have four kids, not in every situation can we reach an accommodation so I can understand some parents have raised the issue,” he said.
But McLean said implementing the proposals would be impossible.
“Say we get this law that says parents are allowed to access their kids facebook accounts, how am I going to prove that I'm your mother?,” she said.
“It's totally unworkable because there is nothing on the internet that allows anyone to age and identity verify anyone, so that's where it's going to fall down in the first place.
“Secondly, American companies aren't necessarily obliged to obey Australian law. Thirdly, tech savvy kids will set up two accounts – here's the one mum can see and here's the one where I do whatever it is I wanna do on it.”
Stephen Collins, spokesman for the online users' lobby group Electronic Frontiers Australia, agreed with McLean that any restrictions would be difficult to enforce.
"We'd very much prefer a social and educational approach - teach people good privacy practice, make it easy for them, educate about acceptable behaviors (e.g. why should online behaviors be different in terms of what we accept from those in the physical world?)," he said.
"So too, a parental right to access that is any greater than exists in law now (such as access to medical details for 16-18 year olds) seems heavy-handed."
Comment is being sought from Facebook. The site counts about 10 million Australian users, or almost half the population.
At the meeting today the attorneys-general will also discuss whether to allow an R18+ rating for video games. The federal government is a vocal supporter of the change but has had difficulty convincing some states that it won't result in a stream of ultra-violent and sexualised games flooding the market.
Privacy is also on the agenda after the government raised the idea of a statutory right to privacy following the hacking scandal that has engulfed News Corporation.
Ways to deal with the online publication of suppressed legal material will also be discussed. Rau said it was clear that suppression orders – which prevent media from reporting details of court cases - were being undermined by social networking sites.


Read more: http://www.theage.com.au/technology/technology-news/facebook-could-become-adults-only-in-australia-20110722-1hrkg.html#ixzz1So5LK27b

Waugh reveals bookie approaches soaring

PAA
Former Australian cricket captain Steve Waugh has revealed 56 cricketers reported illegal approaches by bookmakers to the International Cricket Council last year, after only five players came forward in 2009.
Waugh played his last Test for Australia in 2004 and now plays a pivotal role in attempting to eliminate illegal betting issues from cricket.
The ICC have an anti-corruption and security unit, the body to which players can report suspicious approaches.
Waugh has suggested lie-detector tests would be a good way to catch culprits and also serve as a deterrent.
Waugh, 46, who has taken the polygraph test himself, is currently a member of the MCC's world cricket committee.
"I don't know if the ICC is doing enough," he told BBC Test Match Special. "I'd like to have some conversations with them.
"They are doing some good work because last year 56 players reported an approach by a bookmaker and the year before it was only five, so that suggests the players have confidence in the system and confidence that it will work.
"By taking the lie-detector test I wanted to get the message out there that I was prepared to do this and I saw that [England captain] Andrew Strauss said he was prepared to do one if required too.
"It's totally voluntary and it's not about going over the past, it's about moving forward."
Waugh also called for lifetime bans for captains caught offending and wants the sport's biggest names to back him up.
"Any captain found guilty should have a lifetime ban because they set the tone and values of the side," Waugh said. "If they are doing something wrong it's a lot easier for the younger kids to get involved in it.
"How can the public get some confidence back? People have been caught only by accident over the years, which only goes to show it's very hard to prove and catch people.
"So let's go the other way, let's be positive about it, have people who are ambassadors for the game and are willing to sign these statements and, if required, back it up with a polygraph."
The Age

Scientific method to weight loss

Generic fitness, exercise, gym, bicycle pic. Metabolism boosters ... researchers test weight loss theories.
The room isn't much to look at. Small and plain, with a single bed, a chair, a tiny refrigerator, a sink and a toilet.
But the spartan appearance is deceiving.
This "metabolic chamber" at the UNC Nutrition Research Institute has cost almost $1 million to build and maintain. It's the newest and most sensitive of 17 such research tools in the world, according to Dr Steven Zeisel, the institute's director.
Institute scientists hope the chamber will help them unlock the secrets of human metabolism and provide answers for people who struggle to control their weight.
By monitoring volunteers who stay overnight in the 2.4-metre-by-3.4-metre space, researchers hope to identify foods, activity levels and genes that affect human metabolism. With that, they'll be able to prescribe customised diets and exercise plans that are more likely to work for specific people.
"Nowadays people jump around from diet to diet, and most of the time it doesn't work. Then they get discouraged and maybe just give up," said Karen Corbin, a dietitian and research fellow at the institute. "But once you know for sure what's going to work for someone, and they follow your recommendation and see a result, they're going to be more motivated to stick to it."
The nutrition institute is housed at the North Carolina Research Campus, a $US1.5 billion ($1.4 billion) biotechnology complex. The campus is a collaboration of eight North Carolina universities to promote research in the areas of health and nutrition.
Collaboration among nutritionists, plant biologists and exercise scientists on the same campus enhances the research process, Corbin said.
"There is something to be said for having everybody here. It's easy to get together and talk and say 'Hey, I have this idea. What do you think?'"
Earlier this year, researchers from UNC and Appalachian State published results from the first study using the metabolic chamber. It found that 10 men who exercised vigorously for 45 minutes in the morning continued to burn calories over the next 14 hours.
Proof that an "after-burn" exists could motivate people to exercise intensely enough to get the added benefit, Corbin said.
Currently, the chamber is being used to study whether black pepper increases metabolism. If it does, look for the sponsoring spice company to tout weight-loss enhancing properties.
Institute researchers will work with other food companies and pharmaceutical manufacturers as they try to increase understanding of the role of diet and activity in normal brain development, cancer prevention and the treatment of obesity.
"Everyone's trying to develop products that help people lose weight," said Andrew Swick, director of obesity and eating disorders research at the institute.
"The ultimate goal is individualised nutrition," he said. "We'd love to be able to tell people, 'You're more likely to lose weight by exercising' or 'you're more likely to lose weight by eating this'. We'd like to be able to make recommendations individually based on somebody's genetics."
So far, about 50 volunteers have spent time in the metabolic chamber.
On a recent day, a 50-something woman sat inside the soundproof space, watching a movie on a laptop computer. In an outer room, a computer displayed measurements of the amount oxygen she had consumed, carbon dioxide emitted and calories burned.
She is one of 18 postmenopausal women being monitored for the pepper study. Animal studies suggest that black pepper increases metabolism. Anecdotally, people get hot when they eat pepper, which could mean they burn more calories. But this is the first human study of the hypothesis, Swick said.
Research subjects stay in the chamber for about 24 hours on two occasions, a week apart. During one stay, they eat food made with pepper. During the other stay, they eat food without pepper.
Although they eat the same foods, they get different amounts. "Some people burn less calories per pound [kilo]. Some people burn more calories per pound," Swick said. "We have to feed them an exact amount of calories based on their energy needs."
For example, one woman required 1550 calories while another needed 2150.
In the institute's "metabolic kitchen", cooks prepare food to order, with the exact number of calories, proteins, carbohydrates and fats prescribed by researchers.
Meals are delivered to the chamber in a pass-through between double doors that prevent air from escaping. Subjects must eat their meals at specific times and finish in a certain amount of time. They get up every hour to stretch, and they're not allowed to sleep, except at night-time, because that would decrease their metabolism and skew the study results.
At the end of the study, Swick said, "We'll find out whether black pepper increases metabolic rate or not ... We'll be able to detect less than a 100-calorie difference (per day)."
That's a small amount, but it adds up over time.
"If you overeat by 100 calories per day, you would gain 10 [4.54 kg] a year," Swick said. "If we can find three or four things that raise your calorie requirements and your energy expenditure by 50 to 100 calories (per day), that would be huge."
MCT


Read more: http://www.theage.com.au/lifestyle/wellbeing/scientific-method-to-weight-loss-20110722-1hryb.html#ixzz1So4zTQnN